铬鞣黄牛革全生命周期评价

doi:10.19677/j.issn.1004-7964.2021.04.003

皮革科学与工程 ›› 2021, Vol. 31 ›› Issue (4): 11-16.doi: 10.19677/j.issn.1004-7964.2021.04.003

铬鞣黄牛革全生命周期评价

袁琳琳¹, 姚庆达², 但年华¹, 王璐¹, 李明辉¹, 但卫华^1,2,*, 李正军¹

1.四川大学制革清洁技术国家工程研究中心,四川成都 610065;
2.福建省皮革绿色设计与制造重点实验室,福建晋江 362271

收稿日期:2020-02-07 出版日期:2021-08-28 上线日期:2021-08-02
通讯作者: *但卫华（1956-）,男,教授,博导,E-mail：danweihua_scu@126.com,主要从事制革清洁技术的研究、开发与产业化。
作者简介:袁琳琳（1995-）,女,四川大学轻工科学与工程学院2018级硕士研究生,E-mail：1015682903@qq.com。
基金资助:
生态制革技术研究,2020QT-GXB2025-17-2; 泉州市科技计划项目,2020C038R

Life Cycle Assessment Evaluation of Chrome Tanned Cattle Leather

YUAN Linlin¹, YAO Qingda², DAN Nianhua¹, WANG Lu¹, LI Minghui¹, DAN Weihua^1,2,*, LI Zhengjun¹

1. National Engineering Research Center of Clean Technology in Leather Industry, Sichuan University, Chengdu 610065, China;
2. Fujian Key Laboratory of Green Design and Manufacture of Leather, Jinjiang 362271, China

Received:2020-02-07 Published:2021-08-28 Online:2021-08-02

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 铬鞣法是目前制革工业中最成熟、产品质量最可靠、适合性最广的鞣革方法。然而,由于制革过程需要添加多种化学制剂,所排放的固废、废液、废气等会污染环境,因此,污染成为制革行业发展的最大制约因素。制革过程涉及多工段、多化料,操作复杂,科学合理地评价制革污染成了关乎制革业发展的关键问题。生命周期评价(Life cycle assessment, LCA)是一种可以量化评价一个产品从原料皮到成品革的生命周期环境影响评价方法。本文根据生命周期评价(LCA)的原理及理论框架,采用eFootprint供应链LCA网络平台,以全球变暖潜值(GWP)、一次能源消耗(PED)、酸化潜值(AP)等作为环境影响评价指标,并对铬鞣工艺的黄牛革产品加工过程的主要工序进行了全生命周期评价。这为建立制革行业LCA数据库提供参考示例,为实现我国皮革行业的绿色产业链提供数据支撑。

关键词: 生命周期评价, eFootprint, 铬鞣, 制革清洁生产

Abstract: Chrome tanning is currently the most mature, reliable, and suitable tanning method in leather industry. However, since the leather production needs to add a variety of chemicals, the discharge of the waste solid, liquid, and gas can pollute the environment. Therefore, pollution has become the biggest constraint for the development of leather industry. The leather production process involves multiple stages, multiple materials, and complex operations. Scientific and reasonable pollution evaluation of leather production has become a key issue related to the development of the leather industry. Life cycle assessment (LCA) is an assessment method that can quantitatively evaluate the environmental impact of a product’s life cycle from raw hide to leather. Based on the principles and theoretical framework of LCA, this paper adopted the eFootprint supply LCA network platform, global warming potential (GWP), primary energy consumption (PED), acidification potential (AP), etc. as environmental impact assessment indicators. Also, the main processes of leather production were evaluated throughout the LCA. This work provided a reference example for the establishment of the LCA database for leather industry, and gave the information support for the realization of the green industrial chain of the leather industry in China.

Key words: life cycle assessment, eFootprint, chrome tanning, green leather production

中图分类号:

TS513

袁琳琳, 姚庆达, 但年华, 王璐, 李明辉, 但卫华, 李正军. 铬鞣黄牛革全生命周期评价[J]. 皮革科学与工程, 2021, 31(4): 11-16.

YUAN Linlin, YAO Qingda, DAN Nianhua, WANG Lu, LI Minghui, DAN Weihua, LI Zhengjun. Life Cycle Assessment Evaluation of Chrome Tanned Cattle Leather[J]. Leather Science and Engineering, 2021, 31(4): 11-16.

参考文献

[1] 赵浩然. 皮革加工工艺污染物排放特征研究[D].黑龙江大学,2018.
[2] 章培昆,刘健西.绿色壁垒与中国皮革贸易[J].西部皮革,2012,34(4):34-40.
[3] 陈小珂,刘鹏杰.不规范无春天——解读《制革行业规范条件》[J].中国皮革,2014,43(13):54-58.
[4] 王世成,谢帆,苏芳,等.新冠疫情对中国轻工会展行业的影响[J].皮革科学与工程,2021,31(2):84-87.
[5] 吴永申. 皮革的绿色化发展研究[J].皮革制作与环保科技,2020,1(2):83-85.
[6] 李波,但卫华,但年华.关于制革生产的智能化发展思考[J].皮革科学与工程,2021,31(1):20-23.
[7] Bovea MD, Serrano J, Bruscas G M, et al.Application of life cycle assessment to improve the environmental performance of a ceramic tile packaging system[J]. Packaging Technology & Science, 2006, 19(2): 83-95.
[8] Michael D.LCA for leather and leather products[J]. Leather international, 2010, 212(4802): 22-24.
[9] Franca, W T, Barros M V, Salvador R, et al. Integrating life cycle assessment and life cycle cost: a review of environmental-economic studies[J]. International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 2021, 26(2), 244-274.
[10] Chen W, Hong J, Wang C, et al.Water footprint assessment of gold refining: Case study based on life cycle assessment[J]. Ecological Indicators, 2021, 122: 107319.
[11] 徐晓颖,石佳博,王坤余.基于LCA法对比传统铬鞣工艺和改性戊二醛鞣工艺[J].皮革科学与工程,2015,25(1):5-12.
[12] 单晨,丁绍兰.牛皮革与PU革的生命周期评价比较[J].西部皮革,2011,33(6):12-15.
[13] 王洪涛. 势在必行的生命周期评价[J].高科技与产业化,2014,(5):54-57.
[14] 范闪,郝东艳,马飞,等.基于LCA方法单皮鞋生产环境影响评价体系[J].资源节约与环保,2018,197(4):54.
[15] Castiello D, Puccini M, Seggiani M, et al.Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) of the Oxidative Unhairing Process by Hydrogen Peroxide[J]. Journal of the American Leather Chemists Association, 2008, 103(1):1-6.
[16] Bender M A, Farach-Colton M.The LCA Problem Revisited[C]. Latin American Symposium on Theoretical Informatics. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, 2000, 1776, 88-94
[17] Shi J, Zhang R, Mi Z, et al.Engineering a sustainable chrome-free leather processing based on novel lightfast wet-white tanning system towards eco-leather manufacture[J]. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2020, 282: 124504.
[18] Rosa R, Pini M, Neri P, et al.Environmental sustainability assessment of a new degreasing formulation for the tanning cycle within leather manufacturing[J]. Green Chemistry, 2017, 19(19): 4571-4582.
[19] 欧永智. 工厂供配电系统设计中节电措施的应用及意义解析[J].工程技术,2016,(5):297-297.
[20] Guel S, Spielmann M, Lehmann A, et al.Benchmarking and environmental performance classes in life cycle assessment—development of a procedure for non-leather shoes in the context of the Product Environmental Footprint[J]. International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 2015, 20(12):1640-1648.
[21] Tasca A L, Puccini M.Leather tanning: Life cycle assessment of retanning, fatliquoring and dyeing[J]. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2019, 226: 720-729.
[22] 惠婧璇,万里扬.生命周期评价方法及应用于我国可再生能源领域研究进展[J].中国能源,2020,42(3):42-47.
[23] 邓南圣. 生命周期评价[M].北京:化学工业出版社环境科学与工程出版中心,2003.

铬鞣黄牛革全生命周期评价

Life Cycle Assessment Evaluation of Chrome Tanned Cattle Leather

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	王思懿, 强西怀, 李闻欣, 段郑军, 张江山, 郑超斌. 艾力特AT鞣剂在浸酸与不浸酸工艺体系下的鞣制性能[J]. 皮革科学与工程, 2024, 34(3): 25-30.
[2]	侯振强, 张辉, 强西怀. 无铬鞣废革屑胶原提取物与PBAT共混成膜性能[J]. 皮革科学与工程, 2024, 34(1): 8-17.
[3]	陈勇波, 王俊超, 李开军, 马维宁, 刘公岩. 聚乙二醇化多环氧共聚物的清洁化铬鞣应用[J]. 皮革科学与工程, 2023, 33(3): 37-43.
[4]	孙青永, 曾运航, 王亚楠, 余跃, 石碧. 丙烯酸树脂复鞣剂的亲水性对无铬鞣皮革性能的影响[J]. 皮革科学与工程, 2023, 33(2): 1-7.
[5]	吴晨珠, 陈治军. 无铬山羊手套革的决明子色素染色[J]. 皮革科学与工程, 2023, 33(1): 60-63.
[6]	陈文龙, 刘东磊, 龙忠珍, 陈治军, 单志华. 三嗪类鞣剂的无水合成与鞣性研究[J]. 皮革科学与工程, 2022, 32(6): 45-51.
[7]	刘冠彤, 余跃, 曾运航, 周渝翔, 王亚楠, 石碧. 生命周期评价法评估皮革复鞣剂染整过程的环境影响[J]. 皮革科学与工程, 2022, 32(5): 6-13.
[8]	朱超, 马靓琛, 王曼婷, 马宏瑞, 赵澜博. 一株耐铬真菌的分离鉴定及基于抗氧化酶的耐铬机制研究[J]. 皮革科学与工程, 2022, 32(4): 8-13.
[9]	王圳, 刘洵志, 张雨鑫, 王亚楠, 石碧. 水培-CO₂释放测定法评价皮革的生物降解性[J]. 皮革科学与工程, 2022, 32(3): 65-69.
[10]	余跃, 韩君懋, 王亚楠, 周建飞, 石碧. 基于铝-锆配合物的兔裘革无铬复鞣染色技术[J]. 皮革科学与工程, 2022, 32(2): 60-66.
[11]	刘婷, 强西怀. TWS鞣剂在浸酸与不浸酸体系下鞣制性能研究[J]. 皮革科学与工程, 2021, 31(6): 8-13.
[12]	陈勇波, 朱瑞鑫, 李开军, 稂时英, 汪瑞, 苏辉, 刘公岩. 高吸收铬鞣助剂PEGA的制备及应用[J]. 皮革科学与工程, 2021, 31(5): 48-54.
[13]	王嘉莹, 陈强, 郭雪茹, 余跃, 王亚楠, 石碧. 氧化多糖的相对分子质量对氧化多糖-铝-锆鞣剂鞣制性能的影响[J]. 皮革科学与工程, 2021, 31(5): 6-11.
[14]	王绍腾, 龙忠珍, 陈治军, 单志华. 一种铬泥处理制备再生铬粉探索[J]. 皮革科学与工程, 2021, 31(4): 35-39.
[15]	李晨英, 杨佳, 李生良, 刘军, 陈华林, 丁克毅. 端羧基超支化聚酯高吸收铬鞣助剂研究[J]. 皮革科学与工程, 2021, 31(2): 33-39.