不同硬度的鞋底-鞋垫组合对运动鞋减震性能的影响

doi:10.19677/j.issn.1004-7964.2023.02.012

皮革科学与工程 ›› 2023, Vol. 33 ›› Issue (2): 75-80.doi: 10.19677/j.issn.1004-7964.2023.02.012

不同硬度的鞋底-鞋垫组合对运动鞋减震性能的影响

彭飘林^1,2, 丁绍兰¹, 刘昭霞², 魏书涛³, 吕美莲², 卢鑫⁴

1.陕西科技大学轻工科学与工程学院,陕西西安 710021;
2.黎明职业大学,福建泉州 362000;
3.三六一度（中国）有限公司,福建厦门 361009;
4.福建省橡塑新材料重点实验室,福建泉州 362000

收稿日期:2022-05-31 出版日期:2023-04-01 上线日期:2023-03-21
作者简介:彭飘林（1978-）,男,博士研究生,研究方向:鞋类数字化设计与产品舒适性功能评测及研发。E-mail: pengpiaolin@yeah.net。
基金资助:
黎明职业大学“鞋服产品结构创新与功能研发协同创新中心”科研平台项目（LMPT202106）; 黎明职业大学“服饰品数字化设计技术与产品功能研发”科研团队建设项目(LMTD201903); 泉州市高层次人才创新创业项目（2022C012QR）

Effect of the Sole-Insole Combination with Different Hardness on the Shock Absorption Performance of Sports Shoes

PENG Piaolin^1,2, DING Shaolan¹, LIU Zhaoxia², WEI Shutao³, LV Meilian², LU Xin⁴

1. College of Bioresources Chemical and Materials Engineering, Shaanxi University of Science & Technology, Xi'an 710021, China;
2. Liming Vocational University, Quanzhou 362000, China;
3. 361°(China) Co. Ltd., Xiamen 361009, China;
4. Fujian Key Laboratory of Advanced Rubber-plastics Materials, Quanzhou 362000, China

Received:2022-05-31 Online:2023-04-01 Published:2023-03-21

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 探讨不同硬度的鞋底-鞋垫组合对运动鞋减震性能的影响。采用冲击试验机测试3种不同硬度中底（Shore C35°、Shore-C48°、Shore-C58°）、2种硬度鞋垫（Shore C51°、Shore C71°）及1种橡胶外底（Shore-A51°）的不同组合方式,在3种冲击高度下对减震性能评测指标的影响。结论在高、中、低三种能量冲击下,材料硬度可以显著影响鞋底-鞋垫组合的减震性能,高硬度鞋底或鞋垫组合的鞋底-鞋垫减震性能较差,中等硬度鞋底或无鞋垫组合的鞋底-鞋垫减震性能居中,低硬度鞋底或鞋垫组合鞋底-鞋垫减震性能较好。从降低脚后跟冲击损伤出发,在进行低能量冲击运动如慢走运动,建议选择低硬度的鞋底-鞋垫组合的运动鞋,在进行中等能量冲击运动如快走运动,建议选择低硬度和中等硬度鞋垫搭配的鞋底-鞋垫组合的运动鞋,在进行高能量冲击运动如慢跑运动,建议选择有鞋垫的运动鞋。

关键词: 鞋底-鞋垫, 硬度, 材料评测, 减震性能

Abstract: This paper discusses the effect of the combination of soles and insoles with different hardness on the shock absorption performance of sports shoes . The impact tester was used to test the impact of different combinations of three different hardness mid-soles (Shore C35°, Shore-C48°, Shore-C58°), two hardness insoles (Shore C51°, Shore C71°) and one rubber out-sole (Shore-A51°) on the evaluation index of shock absorption performance at three impact heights.Conclusion: Under the impact of high, medium and low energy, the material hardness can significantly affect the shock-absorbing performance of the sole-insole combination. The shock-absorbing performance of the sole-insole combination with high hardness sole or insole combination is poor, the shock-absorbing performance of the sole-insole combination with medium hardness sole or insole combination is medium, and the shock-absorbing performance of the sole-insole combination with low hardness sole or insole combination is good. In order to reduce the impact damage of the heel, it is recommended to select a low-hardness sole-insole combination sports shoes when performing low-energy impact sports such as low-speed walking,and the sole-inshoe combination sports shoes with low hardness and medium hardness when performing medium energy impact sports such as fast-speed walking, and the sports shoes with insole when performing high energy impact sports such as jogging.

Key words: sole-insole, hardness, material evaluation, shock absorption

中图分类号:

TS943.3

彭飘林, 丁绍兰, 刘昭霞, 魏书涛, 吕美莲, 卢鑫. 不同硬度的鞋底-鞋垫组合对运动鞋减震性能的影响[J]. 皮革科学与工程, 2023, 33(2): 75-80.

PENG Piaolin, DING Shaolan, LIU Zhaoxia, WEI Shutao, LV Meilian, LU Xin. Effect of the Sole-Insole Combination with Different Hardness on the Shock Absorption Performance of Sports Shoes[J]. Leather Science and Engineering, 2023, 33(2): 75-80.

参考文献

[1] 汤运启,王志康,李静,等.足弓结构和跑鞋类型对慢跑状态下足底压力分布的影响[J].皮革科学与工程,2020,30(1):58-63.
[2] Fowler N E,Lees A.The influence of drop height and external loading on performance in drop-jumping[J].Journal of Biomechanics,1994,27(6):665-665.
[3] Laffaye G,Choukou M A.Gender bias in the effect of dropping height on jumping performance in volleyball players[J].Journal of Strength&Conditioning Research,2010,24(8):2143-2148.
[4] 傅维杰,刘宇,魏书涛.篮球鞋对主动与被动落地时冲击力特征和肌肉活化的影响[J].医用生物力学,2012,27(3):317-323.
[5] Ramwadhdoebe T H,Hähnlein J,Maijer K I,et al.Lymph node biopsy analysis reveals an altered immunoregulatory balance already during the at-risk phase of autoantibody positive rheumatoid arthritis[J].European Journal of Immunology,2016,46(12):2812-2821.
[6] 郝琦,李建设,顾耀东.裸足与着鞋下跑步生物力学及损伤特征的研究现状[J].体育科学,2012,32(7):91-97.
[7] 王嘉瑛,李令岭,马梁,等.跑步爱好者运动损伤的调查与分析[J].昆明医科大学学报,2020,41(1):151-157.
[8] Dixon S J.Use of pressure insoles to compare in-shoe loading for modern running shoes[J].Ergonomics,2008,51(10):1503-1514.
[9] Yang C,Xiao S,Yang Y,et al.Patellofemoral joint loads during running immediately changed by shoes with different minimalist indices:A cross-sectional study[J].Applied Sciences-Basel,2019,9(19):417-426.
[10] Chiu H-T,Shiang T-Y.Effects of insoles and additional shock absorption foam on the cushioning properties of sport shoes[J].Journal of Applied Biomechanics,2007,23(2):119-127.
[11] 刘亮. 慢跑鞋减震鞋垫的研究与开发[J].中国皮革,2021,50(11):87-89.
[12] 邱宏达,相子元,林德嘉.由地面反作用力评估鞋底避震能力─材料与人体测试之比較[J].体育学报,2002(32):10-12.
[13] Nashy E,Al-Ashkar E,Moez A A.Optical and spectroscopic studies on tannery wastes as a possible source of organic semiconductors[J].Spectrochimica Acta Part A-Molecular Biomolecular Spectroscopy,2012,86:33-38.
[14] 喻伟才,李鑫,冉美玲,等.鞋垫腰窝高度对足底压力舒适性的影响研究[J].中国皮革,2012,41(16):3-6.
[15] Murray H J,Young M J,Hollis S,et al.The association between callus formation,high pressures and neuropathy in diabetic foot ulceration[J].Diabetic Medicine,1996,13(11):979-982.
[16] 汤运启,戴欣然,王志康,等.鞋垫硬度对鞋靴减震性的影响[J].皮革科学与工程,2020,30(6):52-56.
[17] Baltich J,Maurer C,Nigg B M.Increased vertical impact forces and altered running mechanics with softer midsole shoes[J].Plos One,2015,10(4):e0125196.
[18] Choi J S,Kang D W,Seo J W,et al.Changes in gait characteristics due to outsole structure of shoe[J].Applied Mechanics Materials,2015,775(5):28-33.
[19] 林鸿基,李苏,谭万昌,等.EVA鞋底缓冲性能影响因素的研究[J].中国皮革,2013,42(2):124-126.
[20] 汤运启,王幽幽,秦蕾,等.测试方法对评价运动鞋底减震性能的对比研究[J].中国皮革,2016,45(1):34-36.
[21] 傅庆洪. 运动鞋减震缓冲性能的作用[J].中国皮革,2004,33(10):122-123.
[22] 赵闯. 慢跑鞋减震鞋垫的设计与研究[D].西安:陕西科技大学,2013.
[23] 唐振华,潘丽明,林志勇.运动鞋减震性能试验方法的研究[J].皮革科学与工程,2010,20(2):62-66.
[24] 弓太生,魏全娥,汤运启,等.足底压力测量技术在运动功能鞋研究中的应用及发展[J].皮革科学与工程,2011,21(5):66-68.
[25] 万蓬勃,马丁,汤运启,等.仪仗队军靴底部件材料厚度组合对缓震性能的影响[J].皮革科学与工程,2021,31(4):59-65.
[26] 汤运启,秦蕾,万蓬勃,等.运动鞋鞋垫厚度、硬度对青年女性足底压力舒适性的影响[J].皮革科学与工程,2012,22(4):38-40.
[27] 汤运启,郭新宇,王勇,等.鞋靴主观舒适性评价方法研究进展[J].皮革科学与工程,2022,32(2):47-53.
[28] 卓俊杰. 运动鞋减震回弹性能测试方法及专用检测设备的研究[J].计量与测试技术,2018,45(10):6-7.
[29] 韩珵琨,弓太生.儿童足底压力、功能鞋垫及童鞋舒适性相关研究进展[J].皮革科学与工程,2019,29(3):36-41.

不同硬度的鞋底-鞋垫组合对运动鞋减震性能的影响

Effect of the Sole-Insole Combination with Different Hardness on the Shock Absorption Performance of Sports Shoes

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 14

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	方晨玮, 谢红. 鞋底对老年人负重行走稳定性的影响[J]. 皮革科学与工程, 2023, 33(4): 72-78.
[2]	彭飘林, 丁绍兰, 叶豪, 刘昭霞, 魏书涛, 吕美莲, 廖毅彬. 鞋底-鞋垫减震性能材料测试有限元仿真分析[J]. 皮革科学与工程, 2023, 33(3): 73-78.
[3]	刘钦华, 赵功赫, 初心, 曲峰. 儿童鞋中后底硬度对跑步过程中下肢生物力学影响[J]. 皮革科学与工程, 2021, 31(6): 53-58.
[4]	汤运启, 戴欣然, 王志康, 吴丹, 秦蕾, 魏钰峰, 黄玉萌. 鞋垫硬度对鞋靴减震性的影响[J]. 皮革科学与工程, 2020, 30(6): 52-56.
[5]	马琳;. 浅析新旧标准GB/T3903.4-2017与GB/T3903.4-2008的差异[J]. , 2019, 29(03): 56-58.
[6]	冉美玲;刘子煜;杨璐铭;张惟雯;喻伟才;. 中底硬度与步态周期对足底压力中心轨迹的影响[J]. , 2018, 28(04): 23-.
[7]	顾敏;徐文聪;陈慧;. 制革生产用水钙镁离子含量测试方法优化[J]. , 2018, 28(04): 37-.
[8]	张英;. 适合于不同跟高的压力舒适型鞋内垫参数研究[J]. , 2015, 25(01): 50-53.
[9]	张英;. 适合于不同跟高的压力舒适型鞋内垫参数研究[J]. , 2015, 25(01): 50-53.
[10]	杨璐铭;郝芙蓉;张惟雯;喻伟才;冉美玲;何有节;. 中底硬度对职业女鞋舒适度的影响[J]. , 2014, 24(04): 47-50.
[11]	杨璐铭;郝芙蓉;张惟雯;喻伟才;冉美玲;何有节;. 中底硬度对职业女鞋舒适度的影响[J]. , 2014, 24(04): 47-50.
[12]	张英;弓太生;耿新柱;. 改善高跟鞋穿着舒适性的研究进展[J]. , 2012, 22(04): 41-43.
[13]	张英;弓太生;耿新柱;. 改善高跟鞋穿着舒适性的研究进展[J]. , 2012, 22(04): 41-43.
[14]	唐振华;潘丽明;林志勇;. 运动鞋减震性能试验方法的研究[J]. , 2010, 20(02): 62-66.