糖尿病患者鞋内压力监测系统的预警阈值测试

doi:10.19677/j.issn.1004-7964.2023.06.012

皮革科学与工程 ›› 2023, Vol. 33 ›› Issue (6): 77-84.doi: 10.19677/j.issn.1004-7964.2023.06.012

糖尿病患者鞋内压力监测系统的预警阈值测试

万蓬勃¹, 苗容容^1,*, 王朋利², 郭天宏¹, 李学青¹

1.陕西科技大学设计与艺术学院,陕西西安 710021;
2.陕西科技大学轻工科学与工程学院,陕西西安 710021

收稿日期:2023-01-15 出版日期:2023-12-01 上线日期:2023-11-14
通讯作者: *苗容容(1997-),女,硕士,研究方向:功能鞋靴技术研究及足底压力测试研究。E-mail:1499495153@qq.com。
作者简介:万蓬勃(1976-),男,硕士,副教授,研究方向:功能性服装服饰品技术研发及鞋服数字化与智能化研究。E-mail: Wanpengbo@yeah.net。

Early Warning Threshold Test of the Pressure Monitoring System in the Shoes of Diabetic Patients

WAN Pengbo¹, MIAO Rongrong^1,*, WANG Pengli², GUO Tianhong¹, LI Xueqing¹

1. College of Art and Design, Shaanxi University of Science & Technology, Xi an 710021, China;
2. College of Light Industry Science and Engineering, Shaanxi University of Science & Technology, Xi'an 710021, China

Received:2023-01-15 Online:2023-12-01 Published:2023-11-14

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 探究与II型Wagner0级糖尿病足溃疡风险增加相关的足底峰值压力、压力不适和疼痛阈值,为监测糖尿病患者足底压力的鞋内压力监测系统设定压力预警阈值提供数据支持。使用Footscan足底压力平板采集347名II型Wagner0级糖尿病患者足底10个分区的峰值压力,使用压力测试仪采集30名健康人足底9个测试点,在测试速度0.5、1.0和2.0 mm/s下进行压力不适和疼痛阈值测试。结果发现,II型Wagner0级糖尿病患者左、右足全足的足底峰值压力均表现为男性大于女性,足底主要受力区域为第2、3、4跖骨和足跟。健康人足底压力不适和疼痛阈值具有性别差异(P<0.05)的测试点中,第5跖骨、足弓外侧和后跟中心均表现为男性大于女性,第3跖骨均表现为男性小于女性;男、女性足底压力不适和疼痛阈值整体趋势表现为后跟中心>足弓外侧>跖骨>足弓内侧>大脚趾;在同一测试点下,测试速度越快,测得的压力不适和疼痛阈值越高。综上所述,II型Wagner0级糖尿病患者鞋内压力监测系统的压力预警阈值设定,需根据患者性别和足底区域进行具体调整和决定,建议将糖尿病患者的足底峰值压力、健康人群的足底压力不适阈值和压力疼痛阈值分别设定为压力监测系统中的III级(一般)、II级(较重)和I级(严重)预警值。

关键词: 糖尿病, 足底压力, 不适, 疼痛, 预警, 阈值

Abstract: This work explored the threshold values of peak plantar pressure, pressure discomfort and pain associated with the increased risk of diabetic foot ulcer type II Wagner0, in order to provide data support for setting a pressure warning threshold for the in-shoe pressure monitoring system that can detect the plantar pressure of diabetic patients. A Footscan plantar pressure plate was used to collect the peak pressure in 10 zones of the plantar of 347 patients with type II Wagner0 diabetes mellitus, and a pressure tester was used to collect 9 test points of the plantar of 30 healthy people. The pressure discomfort and pain threshold were tested at the test speeds of 0.5, 1.0 and 2.0 mm/s, respectively. The results showed that the peak plantar pressure in the left and right foot of type II Wagner0 diabetes mellitus was greater in males than in females, and the main stress areas of the plantar were the 2nd, 3rd, 4th metatarsal bone and heel. In the test points of plantar pressure discomfort and pain threshold of healthy people with gender differences (P < 0.05), the fifth metatarsal bone, lateral arch and heel center were more male than female, and the third metatarsal bone were less male than female. The overall trend of plantar pressure discomfort and pain threshold in men and women was center heel > lateral arch > metatarsal > medial arch > big toe. At the same test point, the faster the test speed, the higher the pressure discomfort and pain threshold measured. To sum up, the pressure warning threshold setting of the pressure monitoring system in shoes for type II Wagner0 diabetes patients needs to be adjusted and decided according to the patient's gender and planta region. It is suggested that the peak plantar pressure of diabetic patients, the threshold of plantar pressure discomfort and the threshold of pressure pain of healthy people should be set as level III (general), level II (severe) and level I (severe) warning values in the pressure monitoring system, respectively.

Key words: diabetes mellitus, plantar pressure, discomfort, pain, early warning, threshold value

中图分类号:

TS943

万蓬勃, 苗容容, 王朋利, 郭天宏, 李学青. 糖尿病患者鞋内压力监测系统的预警阈值测试[J]. 皮革科学与工程, 2023, 33(6): 77-84.

WAN Pengbo, MIAO Rongrong, WANG Pengli, GUO Tianhong, LI Xueqing. Early Warning Threshold Test of the Pressure Monitoring System in the Shoes of Diabetic Patients[J]. Leather Science and Engineering, 2023, 33(6): 77-84.

参考文献

[1] Coppini D V, Wellmer A, Weng C, et al.The natural history of diabetic peripheral neuropathy determined by a 12 year prospective study using vibration perception thresholds[J]. Journal of Clinical Neuroscience, 2001, 8(6): 520-524.
[2] 查盼盼,Raju Bista,王椿.足底压力与糖尿病[J].华西医学,2018,33(5):5.
[3] Crawford F,Inkster M,Kleijnen J,et al.Predicting foot ulcers in patients with diabetes:A systematic review and meta-analysis[J].Diabetes/Metabolism Research and Reviews,2007,100(2):65-86.
[4] Gefen A.Pressure-sensing devices for assessment of soft tissue loading under bony prominences:technological concepts and clinical utilization[J].Wounds,2007,19(12):350-362.
[5] Feng Y,Ge Y J,Song Q J.A human identification method based on dynamic plantar pressure distribution[C].Shenzhen:IEEE International Conference on Information and Automation,2011,329-332.
[6] Yamakawa T,Taniguchi K,Asari K,et al.Biometric personal identification based on gait pattern using both feet pressure change[C].Kobe:World Automation Congress,2010,1-6.
[7] 史文飞. 糖尿病患者足底压力研究及监测系统研制[D].北京:北京工业大学,2020.
[8] 弓太生,魏全娥,汤运启,等.足底压力测量技术在运动功能鞋研究中的应用及发展[J].皮革科学与工程,2011,21(5):66-68.
[9] Robbins J M,Strauss G,Aron D,et al.Mortality rates and diabetic foot ulcers:is it time to communicate mortality risk to patients with diabetic foot ulceration?[J].Journal of American Podiatric Medical Association,2008,98(6):489-493.
[10] Jones Petra,Davies M J,Khunti K,et al.In-shoe pressure thresholds for people with diabetes and neuropathy at risk of ulceration:a systematic review[J].Journal of Diabetes and its Complications,2020,35(3):107815.
[11] Abbott C A,Chatwin K E,Rajbhandari S M,et al.Site-specific,critical threshold barefoot peak plantar pressure associated with diabetic foot ulcer history:a novel approach to determine DFU risk in the clinical setting[J].Medicina-Lithuania,2022,58(2):2-14.
[12] Pataky Z,Faravel L,Da Silva J,et al.A new ambulatory foot pressure device for patients with sensory impairment.A system for continuous measurement of plantar pressure and a feed-back alarm[J].Journal of Biomechanics,2000,33(9):1135-1138.
[13] 蔡丽飞,马鑫鑫,杨平.2018版《澳大利亚糖尿病足选鞋指南》解读[J].足踝外科电子杂志,2021,8(4):7-11.
[14] Sidawy A N.Diabetic foot:lower extremity arterial disease and limb salvage[M].Lippincott Williams&Wilkins,2005.
[15] Xiong S,Goonetilleke R S,Jiang Z.Pressure thresholds of the human foot:measurement reliability and effects of stimulus characteristics[J].Ergonomics,2011,54(4):282-293.
[16] Pham H,Armstrong D G,Harvey C,et al.Screening techniques to identify people at high risk for diabetic foot ulceration:a prospective multicenter trial[J].Diabetes Care,2000,23(5):606-611.
[17] 蒋娅. 2型糖尿病患者自然步态下赤足足底压力特征分析及影响因素调查[D].广州:南方医科大学,2013.
[18] Actis R L,Ventura L B,Lott D J,et al.Multi-plug insole design to reduce peak plantar pressure on the diabetic foot during walking[J].Medical&Biological Engineering&Computing,2008,46(4):363-371.
[19] Chesterton L S,Barlas P,Foster N E,et al.Gender differences in pressure pain threshold in healthy humans[J].Pain,2003,101(3):259-266.
[20] Defrin R,Ronat A,ravid A,et al.Spatial summation of pressure pain:effect of body region[J].Pain,2003,106(3):471-480.
[21] Najafi B,Ron E,Enriquez A,et al.Smarter sole survival:will neuropathic patients at high risk for ulceration use a smart insole-based foot protection system?[J].Journal of diabetes science and technology,2017,11(4):702-713.
[22] Frykberg R G,Lavery L A,Pham H,et al.Role of neuropathy and high foot pressures in diabetic foot ulceration[J].Diabetes Care,1998,21(10):1714-1719.
[23] Lavery L A,Armstrong D G,Wunderlich R P,et al.Predictive value of foot pressure assessment as part of a population-based diabetes disease management program[J].Diabetes Care,2003,26(4):1069-1073.
[24] Altayyar S S.Bare foot and in-shoe plantar pressure in diabetic males and females-is there difference?[J].Medical devices(Auckland,NZ),2021,14:271-276.
[25] 李亚洁,蒋娅,薛耀明,等.2型糖尿病患者自然步态下赤足足底压力特征分析[J].护理学报,2013,20(7):1-4.
[26] Lee K H,Lee M H,Kim H S,et al.Pressure pain thresholds[PPT]of head and neck muscles in a normal population[J].Taylor&Francis,2010,2(4):67-81.
[27] 汤运启,苗容容,谢雪,等.健康成年人足部疼痛及不适压力阈值测试与分析[J].中国皮革,2020,49(9):36-42.
[28] 王爱红,李家兰,许樟荣,等.2型糖尿病患者的足底压力研究[J].中华内分泌代谢杂志,2005(6):500-501.
[29] 冯逍,王维萍,史小英,等.基于压力转移模型的糖尿病足溃疡模拟研究[J].皮革科学与工程,2020,30(6):47-51.
[30] Rolke R,Andrews Campbell K,Magerl W,et al.Deep pain thresholds in the distal limbs of healthy human subjects[J].European Journal of Pain,2005,9(1):39-48.
[31] Weerasinghe T W,Goonetilleke R S,Reischl U.Pressure thresholds and stiffness on the plantar surface of the human foot[J].Ergonomics,2017,60(7):985-996.
[32] 弓太生,韩雪净,万蓬勃,等.糖尿病患者足部辅具研究现状[J].皮革科学与工程,2022,32(3):42-47.

糖尿病患者鞋内压力监测系统的预警阈值测试

Early Warning Threshold Test of the Pressure Monitoring System in the Shoes of Diabetic Patients

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	孙鑫, 娄本敬, 谢露, 边巴. 高原世居藏族与移居汉族健康青年足底压力分布特征对比[J]. 皮革科学与工程, 2024, 34(1): 93-100.
[2]	杨璐铭, 刘源, 郑德斌, 刘青云, 晏诗阳. 足外翻对健康儿童行走状态下足底负荷模式的影响[J]. 皮革科学与工程, 2023, 33(2): 69-74.
[3]	井兰香. 长期穿高跟鞋对女性足底构筑及压力的影响[J]. 皮革科学与工程, 2022, 32(6): 73-78.
[4]	弓太生, 韩雪净, 万蓬勃, 倪亮辰, 王梦园, 王猛. 糖尿病患者足部辅具研究现状[J]. 皮革科学与工程, 2022, 32(3): 42-47.
[5]	赵碎浪, 祁子芮, 曹中华, 于百计. 3D打印支撑鞋垫对扁平足足底压力分布的影响[J]. 皮革科学与工程, 2022, 32(3): 85-89.
[6]	孔令华, 袁鹏程, 赵卫. 可动假足装置在鞋压力舒适性研究中的应用[J]. 皮革科学与工程, 2022, 32(3): 96-99.
[7]	刘星辰, 谢红, 卢星宇. 基于CiteSpace下足底压力研究可视化分析[J]. 皮革科学与工程, 2021, 31(5): 82-87.
[8]	郑德斌, 赵义红, 晏诗阳, 杨璐铭, 何有节. 足弓发育期扁平足儿童的足底压力跟踪研究[J]. 皮革科学与工程, 2021, 31(3): 61-65.
[9]	冯逍, 王维萍, 史小英, 周晋, 陈雨. 基于压力转移模型的糖尿病足溃疡模拟研究[J]. 皮革科学与工程, 2020, 30(6): 47-51.
[10]	汤运启, 戴欣然, 王志康, 吴丹, 秦蕾, 魏钰峰, 黄玉萌. 鞋垫硬度对鞋靴减震性的影响[J]. 皮革科学与工程, 2020, 30(6): 52-56.
[11]	舒世益. 基于足底压力特点角度的拇趾外翻矫形鞋设计[J]. 皮革科学与工程, 2020, 30(5): 62-66.
[12]	黄趋庭, 梁琪悦, 文勇, 陈政, 徐波, 何有节. 儿童机能鞋鞋垫跟杯高度与腰窝结构对行走稳定性的影响[J]. 皮革科学与工程, 2020, 30(3): 68-71.
[13]	赵义红, 茅普优, 孙晓虹, 胥瑞雪, 杨璐铭. 儿童步态时空参数和足底压力的影响因素[J]. 皮革科学与工程, 2020, 30(3): 77-83.
[14]	汤运启, 王志康, 李静, 张移帆, 潘加浩, 魏书涛. 足弓结构和跑鞋类型对慢跑状态下足底压力分布的影响[J]. 皮革科学与工程, 2020, 30(1): 58-63.
[15]	韩珵琨;弓太生;. 儿童足底压力、功能鞋垫及童鞋舒适性相关研究进展[J]. , 2019, 29(03): 36-41.