足弓支撑鞋垫对扁平足女性行走时下肢肌电特征影响

doi:10.19677/j.issn.1004-7964.2022.06.012

皮革科学与工程 ›› 2022, Vol. 32 ›› Issue (6): 69-72.doi: 10.19677/j.issn.1004-7964.2022.06.012

足弓支撑鞋垫对扁平足女性行走时下肢肌电特征影响

李佳祺¹, 郑义^2,*

1.北京体育大学,北京 100089;
2.首都体育学院,北京 100089

收稿日期:2022-02-17 出版日期:2022-12-28 上线日期:2022-11-22
通讯作者: * 郑义(1982-),女,副教授,主要从事足部生物力学的教学与研究,E-mail:zhengyi@bsu.edu.cn。
作者简介:李佳祺（1998-）,女,硕士生在读,主要从事运动人体科学相关研究,E-mail:lijiaqi202202@163.com。

Effects of Arch Support Insoles on Electromyographic of Lower Limbs in Female during Walking with Flatfeet

LI Jiaqi¹, ZHENG Yi^2,*

1. Beijing Sport University, Beijing 100089, China;
2. Capital University of Physical Education and Sports, Beijing 100089, China

Received:2022-02-17 Online:2022-12-28 Published:2022-11-22

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 为探究行走时扁平足与正常足女性下肢肌电差异以及足弓支撑鞋垫的作用,实验纳入14名女大学生,正常足穿普通鞋垫(N),扁平足双脚穿足弓支撑鞋垫(FF+ASI)和普通鞋垫(FF)分别行走30 min。使用Trigno无线表面肌电每10 min采集患侧股直肌(RF)、胫骨前肌(AT)、腓骨长肌(PL)、腓肠肌内、外侧头(MHOG)、(LHOG)的均方根振幅(RMS)。FF组与N组RMS比：第1 min LHOG差异具有显著性(P =0.021),PL差异具有极显著性(P =0.006);第10 min PL、MHOG、LHOG具有极显著差异(P =0)、(P =0)、(P =0.001);第20 min PL、LHOG差异具有显著性(P =0.022)、(P =0.016),MHOG具有极显著差异(P =0.006);第30 min PL差异具有显著性(P =0.023),MHOG、LHOG具有极显著差异(P =0.007)、(P = 0.007)。FF+ASI与FF相比,第10 min PL具有极显著性差异(P =0.006)。综上,扁平足女性PL、MHOG和LHOG放电水平高于正常足,导致下肢肌肉更易疲劳,穿着足弓支撑鞋垫能够缓解MHOG、RF、AT、LHOG的疲劳。

关键词: 扁平足, 足弓支撑鞋垫, 肌电, 女性

Abstract: To investigate the differences in lower limb electromyography between women with flat feet and normal feet during walking, and the effects of arch support insoles, a total of 14 female university students were recruited, with normal feet (N) wearing normal insoles and flat feet walking for 30 minutes on both feet wearing arch support insoles (FF+ASI) and normal insoles (FF), respectively. EMG signals of the rectus femoris (RF), anterior tibialis (AT), longissimus peroneus (PL), medial head of gastrocnemius (MHOG), and lateral head of gastrocnemius (LHOG) on the affected side were obtained using the Trigno wireless surface system, and Root Mean Square (RMS) were collected every 10 minutes. The differences in RMS between FF and N groups: LHOG was significant (P =0.021) and PL was highly significant (P =0.006) at the 1st minute; PL, MHOG and LHOG were highly significant (P =0), (P =0), (P =0.001) at the 10th minute; PL and LHOG were significant (P =0.022), (P =0.016) and MHOG was highly significant (P =0.006) at the 20th minute; PL was significant (P =0.023), MHOG and LHOG were highly significant (P =0.007), (P =0.007) at the 30th minute. The difference in RMS of FF+ASI compared to FF was highly significant only for PL at the 10th minute (P =0.006). In conclusion, women with flat feet showed higher levels of PL, MHOG and LHOG discharge than normal feet, resulting in more fatigue in the lower limb muscles. Fortunately,wearing arch support insoles relieved fatigue in MHOG, RF, AT and LHOG.

Key words: flat feet, arch support insoles, electromyography, female

中图分类号:

TS943.1

李佳祺, 郑义. 足弓支撑鞋垫对扁平足女性行走时下肢肌电特征影响[J]. 皮革科学与工程, 2022, 32(6): 69-72.

LI Jiaqi, ZHENG Yi. Effects of Arch Support Insoles on Electromyographic of Lower Limbs in Female during Walking with Flatfeet[J]. Leather Science and Engineering, 2022, 32(6): 69-72.

参考文献

[1] 于竹筠,孙强.普通大学女生扁平足与平衡能力的关系研究[J].湖北体育科技,2017,36(7):595-597.
[2] 田飞,杨一帆,丁桃.青少年脊柱侧凸的生物力学因素相关性研究[J].中国康复理论与实践,2018,24(4):453-456.
[3] 赵碎浪,杨峰,曹中华.正常足与扁平足步行支撑期足弓角变化研究[J].皮革科学与工程,2021,31(4):55-58,92.
[4] Su S,Mo Z,Guo J,et al.The Effect of Arch Height and Material Hardness of Personalized Insole on Correction and Tissues of Flatfoot[J].Journal of healthcare engineering,2018,4136246.
[5] Murley GS,Menz HB,Landorf KB.Foot posture influences the electromyographic activity of selected lower limb muscles during gait[J].Journal of Foot and Ankle Research,2009:2-35.
[6] Murley GS,Landorf KB,Menz HB,et al.Effect of foot posture,foot orthoses and footwear on lower limb muscle activity during walking and running:a systematic review[J].Gait Posture,2009,29(2):172-187.
[7] 孟倩云,刘威彤,于瑷旗.长时间行走对扁平足人群足底压力,下肢肌电变化的影响[C].第十六届全国运动生物力学学术交流大会(CABS 2013)论文集,2013:114.
[8] Toullec E.Adult flatfoot[J].Orthopaedics&traumatology surgery&research,2015,101(1)Suppl:S11-7.
[9] Memeo A,Verdoni F,Rossi L,et al.Flexible Juvenile Flat Foot Surgical Correction:A Comparison Between Two Techniques After Ten Years'Experience[J].J Foot Ankle Surg,2019,58(2):203-207.
[10] Zafiropoulos G,Prasad KS,Kouboura T,et al.Flat foot and femoral anteversion in children--a prospective study[J].Foot(Edinb),2009,19(1):50-54.
[11] Kodithuwakku Arachchige SNK,Chander H,Knight A.Flatfeet:Biomechanical implications,assessment and management[J].Foot(Edinb),2019,38:81-85.
[12] 廖苏. 矫形鞋垫对扁平足和内翻膝步态矫正效果的研究[D].北京体育大学,2013.
[13] 邵雪荣,孟倩云,刘威彤.扁平足人群跑步过程中下肢运动学与动力学研究[J].当代体育科技,2018,8(28):27-28+30.
[14] Choi JY,Hong WH,Suh JS,et al.The long-term structural effect of orthoses for pediatric flexible flat foot:A systematic review[J].Foot Ankle Surg,2020,26(2):181-188.
[15] Hunt AE,Smith RM.Mechanics and control of the flat versus normal foot during the stance phase of walking[J].Clin Biomech(Bristol,Avon),2004,19(4):391-397.
[16] Den Otter AR,Geurts AC,Mulder T,et al.Speed related changes in muscle activity from normal to very slow walking speeds[J].Gait Posture,2004,19(3):270-278.
[17] 黄萍,齐进,邓廉夫.正常青年人自然步态下肢肌的表面肌电图分析[J].中国组织工程研究, 2012, 16(20): 3680-3684.

足弓支撑鞋垫对扁平足女性行走时下肢肌电特征影响

Effects of Arch Support Insoles on Electromyographic of Lower Limbs in Female during Walking with Flatfeet

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	苏晨, 岳思雨, 吴昊, 江驭鹏, 彭魏, 黄其瑞. 基于Kano-FBS模型的妊娠期女性鞋履设计研究[J]. 皮革科学与工程, 2023, 33(5): 79-85.
[2]	赵碎浪, 祁子芮, 曹中华, 于百计. 3D打印支撑鞋垫对扁平足足底压力分布的影响[J]. 皮革科学与工程, 2022, 32(3): 85-89.
[3]	辛东升, 王占星, 闫文飞, 马英华, 程正平, 夏润亭, 陈上. 冰刀鞋刀桥结构差异对下肢表面肌电的影响[J]. 皮革科学与工程, 2022, 32(2): 94-99.
[4]	郑德斌, 赵义红, 晏诗阳, 杨璐铭, 何有节. 足弓发育期扁平足儿童的足底压力跟踪研究[J]. 皮革科学与工程, 2021, 31(3): 61-65.
[5]	刘梦媛, 刘浩, 晏诗阳, 赵义红, 杨璐铭. 扁平足矫形鞋垫的研究进展[J]. 皮革科学与工程, 2021, 31(2): 54-61.
[6]	韩艳坤, 霍洪峰. 青年男性扁平足患者站立位足型特征研究[J]. 皮革科学与工程, 2020, 30(2): 85-89.
[7]	冉美玲;刘子煜;杨璐铭;张惟雯;喻伟才;. 中底硬度与步态周期对足底压力中心轨迹的影响[J]. , 2018, 28(04): 23-.
[8]	冉美玲;王玥;张林杉;杨璐铭;张惟雯;喻伟才;. 高跟鞋肥瘦型对青年女性穿着舒适度的影响研究[J]. , 2017, 27(06): 10-.
[9]	赵义红;王玥;孙晓虹;张林杉;李若依;晏诗阳;杨璐铭;. 运动表面对人体生物力学性能影响的研究进展[J]. , 2017, 27(05): 29-35.
[10]	李晓芸;冉诗雅;杨璐铭;陈学灿;陈大志;. 三种负重状态下青年女性的三维脚型数据对比分析[J]. , 2016, 26(05): 48-54.
[11]	弓太生;刘淼;万蓬勃;. 表面肌电与足底压力同步测量技术的应用——改善鞋靴穿着舒适性方面[J]. , 2015, 25(01): 46-49.
[12]	弓太生;刘淼;万蓬勃;. 表面肌电与足底压力同步测量技术的应用——改善鞋靴穿着舒适性方面[J]. , 2015, 25(01): 46-49.
[13]	郝芙蓉;冉美玲;晏诗阳;晏虹;杨璐铭;伍舒闻;何有节;. 中国当代青年女性脚型结构特点及足底压力分布研究[J]. , 2013, 23(04): 47-51.
[14]	汤运启;秦蕾;康捷;徐玲玲;. 鞋楦后跷高度对青年女性静态足底压力分布的影响[J]. , 2013, 23(04): 52-54.
[15]	郝芙蓉;冉美玲;晏诗阳;晏虹;杨璐铭;伍舒闻;何有节;. 中国当代青年女性脚型结构特点及足底压力分布研究[J]. , 2013, 23(04): 47-51.